x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Safety CollectionRemove Safety Collection filter
Author
- Ross, Jacqueline3
- Windle, Pamela E3
- Krenzischek, Dina A2
- Mamaril, Myrna2
- Becker, Shawn C1
- Birkelund, Regner1
- Clifford, Theresa L1
- Connolly, Mary1
- Dunn, Debra1
- Fossum, Susan1
- Goode, Denise1
- Hasfeldt, Dorthe1
- Hicks, Rodney W1
- Iacono, Maureen V1
- Laerkner, Eva1
- Lakdawala, Linda1
- Odom-Forren, Jan1
- Ranum, Darrell1
- Saufl, Nancy M1
- Setaro, Jill1
- Sullivan, Ellen E1
Keyword
- patient safety5
- PACU3
- advocacy1
- ambulatory surgery1
- ASPAN Safety Model1
- best practice1
- day surgery1
- evidence-based practice1
- fatigue1
- legal issues1
- medication error1
- MEDMARX1
- noise1
- nursing1
- obstructive sleep apnea1
- operating room1
- operating theatre1
- perianesthesia nursing1
- perianesthesia safety1
- perioperative1
- postanesthesia nursing1
- review1
- risk management1
- safe practice1
- safety huddle1
Safety Collection
16 Results
- Original Article
Safety Huddles in the PACU: When a Patient Self-Medicates
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 26Issue 2p96–102Published in issue: April, 2011- Jill Setaro
- Mary Connolly
Cited in Scopus: 11The implementation of safety huddles in the PACU has been effective in enhancing and promoting patient safety during the recovery period. The case scenario presented in this article demonstrates how the safety huddle can be used to examine nursing care in the PACU. Allotting time each day to address patient-related issues that arise during patient care allows the team to troubleshoot and resolve clinical issues. Through examination of nursing practices in the recovery period, PACU nurses are able to support the best perianesthesia care possible. - Original Article
Creating a Safer Perioperative Environment With an Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening Tool
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 26Issue 1p15–24Published online: January 3, 2011- Linda Lakdawala
Cited in Scopus: 14Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common condition that increases the risk of complications for patients undergoing sedation and/or general anesthesia. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to promote evidence-based practice for nurses to screen patients with OSA in the perioperative setting. A step-by-step team process was implemented using the Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice in a shared leadership environment at an acute care facility to educate staff and evaluate the practice change. - Original Article
Noise in the Operating Room—What Do We Know? A Review of the Literature
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 25Issue 6p380–386Published in issue: December, 2010- Dorthe Hasfeldt
- Eva Laerkner
- Regner Birkelund
Cited in Scopus: 63Because noise is a general stressor, noise in the OR should be avoided whenever possible. This article presents the results of a review of the research literature on the topic of noise in the OR. A systematic literature search was conducted. Eighteen relevant articles were identified and categorized as follows: noise levels, noise sources, staff performances, and patient’s perception of noise. Each study was assessed according to the strength of the evidence and the quality of the study. Noise levels in the OR in general exceed recommended levels, and the noise sources are related to equipment and staff behavior. - Editorial Opinion
Patient Safety—Ten Years Later
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 25Issue 4p209–211Published in issue: August, 2010- Jan Odom-Forren
Cited in Scopus: 0December 1, 2009 was the tenth anniversary of To Err is Human,1 the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report on medical errors in the health care system. Dr. Wachter notes that this report “arguably launched the modern patient-safety movement.”2 In an updated analysis, Wachter looks at the progress that has been made since that initial report and also gives an in-depth description of the gaps that are still present. - Clinical Clips
Pre-printed Opioid Medication Orders
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 24Issue 6p399–400Published in issue: December, 2009- Ellen E. Sullivan
Cited in Scopus: 0PRE-PRINTED ORDERS are often used in the PACU setting to allow for timely intervention in treating postoperative pain. These orders are intended to provide safe and efficient care in a specialty unit by providing specific orders from physicians to the nursing staff who are appropriately assessing patients' needs for management and treatment of pain. - Leadership/Management
Handoff Communication: Opportunities for Improvement
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 24Issue 5p324–326Published in issue: October, 2009- Maureen V. Iacono
Cited in Scopus: 2THERE IS NO PAUCITY of information related to the problems that arise when communication between health care workers is poor, minimized, ignored, or absent. The literature abounds with scenarios, true stories, and real incidents where incomplete communication played a significant part in an untoward patient outcome. Multiple medical and nursing reports, journal articles, and media portrayals tell the story. In fact, nurse managers can simply review incident reports and listen to concerns related to poor handoff of care to find unit-specific evidence that there are numerous opportunities for improvement. - Original Article
Improving Patient Safety by Understanding Past Experiences in Day Surgery and PACU
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 24Issue 3p144–151Published in issue: June, 2009- Jacqueline Ross
- Darrell Ranum
Cited in Scopus: 6Patient safety is a priority, yet little is understood regarding the nature of errors in the perianesthesia settings. The purpose of this claims analysis was to examine patient safety issues in the day surgery and PACU. A retrospective, exploratory design was used. Ninety-three patient safety cases were identified. Differences emerged between PACU and day surgery in regard to allegations and risk management issues. Thirty-nine percent of PACU and 25% of day surgery cases involved nurses as the primary responsible party. - Patient Safety
Understanding Never Events
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 24Issue 3p191–193Published in issue: June, 2009- Jacqueline Ross
Cited in Scopus: 1THE NATIONAL Quality Forum (NQF) is a nonprofit organization comprised of policy makers, physicians, hospitals, and businesses that was created to develop and implement a national strategy for health care quality reporting and measurement. One of the leading causes of death and injury in the United States is adverse events occurring in the hospital setting.1 Based on this finding, the NQF developed a list of 27 adverse events, also referred to as never events, in 2002. These events were considered serious enough to be reported publically. - Accreditation Issues
2009 National Patient Safety Goals
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 24Issue 2p114–118Published in issue: April, 2009- Nancy M. Saufl
Cited in Scopus: 5The Joint Commission (TJC) established its National Patient Safety Goals (NPSGs) program in 2002 and the first set of Goals was effective January 1, 2003. The NPSGs were established to help accredited organizations address specific areas of concern regarding patient safety. The development and annual updating of the NPSGs is overseen by a panel of patient safety experts, including nurses, physicians, pharmacists, risk managers, and other professionals who have hands-on experience in addressing patient safety issues in a variety of health care settings. - Council on Surgical and Perioperative Safety
Statement on Violence in the Workplace The Council on Surgical & Perioperative Safety (Approved October 9, 2007)
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 24Issue 2p72–74Published in issue: April, 2009- Denise Goode
Cited in Scopus: 1The Council on Surgical & Perioperative Safety (CSPS) has agreed on many safe surgery principles concerning the safe care of surgical patients and the promotion of a caring workplace environment for the entire perioperative team. One of these principles is that violence in the workplace must not be tolerated under any circumstances. Thus, the CSPS proposed a Statement on Violence in the Workplace that was approved in October 2007. - Original Article
Perianesthesia Nursing Advocacy: An Influential Voice for Patient Safety
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 23Issue 3p163–171Published in issue: June, 2008- Pamela E. Windle
- Myrna Mamaril
- Susan Fossum
Cited in Scopus: 10Perianesthesia nurses are called to advocate for their patients, promote a safe work environment, and contribute to the continued advancement of the nursing profession. Nurses must demonstrate vigilance in their nursing care to protect patients from harm. It is an ethical and legal responsibility to request physicians to review with patients their informed consents when they report they do not understand or have questions about the surgical procedure. Likewise, nurses need to alert managers and administrators when they experience unsafe work environments, such as actual or potential nurse staffing issues, unsafe nurse-to-patient ratios, medication errors, and nurse fatigue. - Patient Safety
Fatigue: Do You Understand the Risks to Safety?
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 23Issue 1p57–59Published in issue: February, 2008- Jacqueline Ross
Cited in Scopus: 5A LANDMARK publication from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System, highlighted the importance of patient safety in the hospital and ambulatory settings.1 This report spurred health care organizations to begin examining their systems and move from a culture of blame to a culture of safety.1 Health care systems, like hospitals, are complex and highly interdependent. It is important, therefore, to emphasize that most errors occur because of system, rather than human-related errors. - Original Article
Medication Errors in the PACU
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 22Issue 6p413–419Published in issue: December, 2007- Rodney W. Hicks
- Shawn C. Becker
- Pamela E. Windle
- Dina A. Krenzischek
Cited in Scopus: 16A collaborative research group examined seven years of PACU medication errors from the MEDMARX database. Descriptive statistics showed a comparison of medication errors in all ages from pediatric to adult to geriatric groups. Nine categories of medication errors were noted and a total of 3,023 errors were attributed to errors in prescribing, transcribing, dispensing, administering, and monitoring. Harmful errors were present in 5.8% of the sample, which included two patient deaths. Results indicated that errors can occur in any age group. - ASPAN Position Statement
American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses: A Position Statement on Perianesthesia Safety
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 22Issue 6p368–369Published in issue: December, 2007Cited in Scopus: 0ASPAN has the responsibility of defining the principles of safe, quality nursing practice in the perianesthesia setting. ASPAN, therefore, sets forth this position to define the scope of perianesthesia safety. - Original Article
Patient Safety: Perianesthesia Nursing's Essential Role in Safe Practice
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 22Issue 6p385–392Published in issue: December, 2007- Dina A. Krenzischek
- Theresa L. Clifford
- Pamela E. Windle
- Myrna Mamaril
Cited in Scopus: 9A safety culture that promotes best practices and best outcomes is important in today's healthcare environment. The perianesthesia environment of care is constantly challenged with the introduction of new technologies, improved medications, and advances in surgical and nonsurgical procedures. This practice is also marked by fast turnover, increasing volume, and, often, high-acuity patients. The integration of principles of safety and evidence-based principles is a core value of perianesthesia practice. - Continuing education
Surgical Site Verification: A Through Z
Journal of PeriAnesthesia NursingVol. 21Issue 5p317–331Published in issue: October, 2006- Debra Dunn
Cited in Scopus: 11Performing the correct procedure on the correct patient has always been of prime importance to all health care providers. For the past six years, it has been a patient safety initiative priority of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO). Before JCAHO took the lead in this arena, however, health care facilities handled this issue with individualized policies and procedures. This became problematic because physicians practice in multiple institutions that could have conflicting policies, which could confuse the issue.