Advertisement

Incorporating Evidence-based Ultrasound-guided Vascular Access (USGVA) Standards Into the Nurse Anesthetist Armamentarium: A Quality Improvement Project

Published:January 18, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2022.11.014

      Abstract

      Purpose

      This quality improvement (QI) project developed and implemented a hybrid training program, that included online modules and hands-on training for experienced certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) to increase confidence, knowledge, and competency with ultrasound-guided vascular access (USGVA).

      Design

      This QI project used a pre-post design. Seventeen volunteer CRNAs participated in USGVA training and education, and a 90-day follow-up assessment was performed.

      Methods

      The Revised Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE 2.0) guidelines were used as a framework to assess confidence, knowledge, and hands-on competency of 17 CRNAs who regularly place vascular access devices using USGVA in patients with difficult vascular access at a single facility. These assessments were measured at: (1) baseline, (2) immediately after attending a hybrid training educational program, and (3) 90 days after implementation into clinical practice. Additionally, the number of vascular access attempts required for successful placement of peripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters, arterial catheters, and central venous catheters (CVC) with ultrasound assistance over a 90-day period was reviewed.

      Findings

      Certified registered nurse anesthetists’ median confidence score increased significantly from pre- to post-education (P = .009). The confidence reported from post- to 90 days post-education improved, however it did not reach statistical significance (P = .812). The knowledge scores from pre- to post-education indicated significant improvement (P <. 001), as well as from pre- to 90 days post-education (P = .03). However, knowledge scores from post- to 90 days post-education revealed a statistically significant decline (P = .004). The overall median score for hands-on USGVA competency declined from post- to 90 days post-education (P = .109). The number of successful USGVA placements increased from 50% to 80% within a 90-day period.

      Conclusions

      The implementation of a USGVA hybrid training and education program improved overall provider confidence, knowledge, and competency. While confidence remained high in the 90-day follow-up, knowledge retention declined. Despite a decline in knowledge retention over time, results showed a significant improvement when compared to baseline scores. Although a decline in hands-on USGVA competency was seen at 90 days posteducation, it was not statistically significant. The percentage of overall successful USGVA placements in clinical practice increased following implementation.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fagley RE
        • Haney MF
        • Beraud AS
        • et al.
        Critical care basic ultrasound learning goals for American anesthesiology critical care trainees: recommendations from an expert group.
        Anesth Analg. 2015; 120: 1041-1053https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000000652
        • Moore CL
        • Copel JA.
        Point-of-care ultrasonography.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 749-757https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0909487
        • Sandhu NS
        Ultrasound imaging in anesthesia: an overview of vascular access and peripheral nerve blocks.
        Semin Anesth. 2007; 26: 197-209https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sane.2007.10.003
        • Bortman J
        • Mahmood F
        • Mitchell J
        • et al.
        Ultrasound-guided intravenous line placement course for certified registered nurse anesthetists: a necessary next step.
        AANA J. 2019; 87: 269-275
        • Ballard HA
        • Tsao M
        • Robles A
        • et al.
        Use of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum to improve ultrasound-guided vascular access skills of pediatric anesthesiologists.
        Pediatr Anaesth. 2020; 30: 1204-1210https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.13953
      1. 2020 top 10 health technology hazards executive brief.
        ECRI, 2020 (Updated January 18. Accessed June 20, 2020)
        • Tolsgaard MG
        • Ringsted C
        • Dreisler E
        • et al.
        Reliable and valid assessment of ultrasound operator competence in obstetrics and gynecology: assessment of ultrasound competence.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 43: 437-443https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13198
        • Vezzani A
        • Manca T
        • Vercelli A
        • Braghieri A
        • Magnacavallo A.
        Ultrasonography as a guide during vascular access procedures and in the diagnosis of complications.
        J Ultrasound. 2013; 16: 161-170https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-013-0046-5
      2. AIUM practice parameter for the use of ultrasound to guide vascular access procedures.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2019; 38: E4-E18https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14954
        • Kumar A
        • Chuan A.
        Ultrasound guided vascular access: Efficacy and safety.
        Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009; 23: 299-311https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2009.02.006
        • Tonelli C
        • Ringhouse B
        • Bunn C
        • Luchette F.
        The impact of the aging population on surgical diseases.
        Curr Geri Rep. 2021; 10: 21-31https://doi.org/10.1007/s13670-020-00352-4
        • Franco-Sadud R
        • Schnobrich D
        • Mathews BK
        • et al.
        Recommendations on the use of ultrasound guidance for central and peripheral vascular access in adults: a position statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine.
        J Hosp Med. 2019; 14https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3287
      3. Standards for accreditation of nurse anesthesia programs: practice doctorate. Updated May 27, 2022. Accessed October 30, 2022. https://www.coacrna.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/Standards-for-Accreditation-of-Nurse-Anesthesia-Programs-Practice-Doctorate-revised-May-2022.pdf

      4. Point-of-care ultrasound in anesthesia care: Practice considerations. American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. Accessed June 20, 2020. https://www.aana.com/docs/default-source/practice-aana-com-web-documents-(all)/professional-practice-manual/pocus-in-anesthesia-care-practice-considerations.pdf?sfvrsn=a3259e3e_2

        • Troianos CA
        • Hartman GS
        • Glas KE
        • et al.
        Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists.
        J American Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24: 1291-1318https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2011.09.021
        • Partovi-Deilami K
        • Nielsen JK
        • Moller AM
        • Nesheim SSS
        • Jorgensen VL.
        Effect of ultrasound-guided placement of difficult-to-place peripheral venous catheters: a prospective study of a training program for nurse anesthetists.
        AANA J. 2016; 84: 86-92
        • Shiloh AL
        • Savel RH
        • Paulin LM
        • Eisen LA.
        Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the radial artery.
        Chest. 2011; 139: 524-529https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.10-0919
        • Sobolev M
        • Shiloh AL
        • Di Biase L
        • Slovut DP.
        Ultrasound-guided cannulation of the femoral vein in electrophysiological procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Europace. 2017; 19: 850-855https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euw113
        • Bahl A
        • Pandurangadu AV
        • Tucker J
        • Bagan M.
        A randomized controlled trial assessing the use of ultrasound for nurse-performed IV placement in difficult access ED patients.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34: 1950-1954https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.06.098
        • Tang L
        • Wang F
        • Li Y
        • et al.
        Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lazzeri C., ed.
        PLoS ONE. 2014; 9e111527https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111527
        • Zhang W
        • Li K
        • Xu H
        • et al.
        Efficacy of ultrasound-guided technique for radial artery catheterization in pediatric populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
        Crit Care. 2020; 24: 197https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02920-8
        • Loon FHV
        • Scholten HJ
        • Erp IV
        • Bouwman AR
        • Daele ATDV.
        Establishing the required components for training in ultrasoundguided peripheral intravenous cannulation: a systematic review of available evidence.
        Med Ultrason. 2019; 21: 464https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-2120
        • Wagner M
        • Hauser K
        • Cardona F
        • et al.
        Implementation and evaluation of training for ultrasound-guided vascular access to small vessels using a low-cost cadaver model.
        Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19: e611https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000001721
        • Blaivas M
        • Adhikari S.
        An unseen danger: frequency of posterior vessel wall penetration by needles during attempts to place internal jugular vein central catheters using ultrasound guidance.
        Crit Care Med. 2009; 37: 2345-2349https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a067d4
        • Ogrinc G
        • Davies L
        • Goodman D
        • Batalden P
        • Davidoff F
        • Stevens D.
        SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for quality improvement reporting excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.
        BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25: 986-992https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
      5. Practice guidelines for central venous access 2020.
        Anesthesiology. 2020; 132: 8-43https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002864