Advertisement

Effectiveness of Nurse-led Preoperative Assessment for Anesthesia: A Prospective Cohort Study

  • Cecilia Díez-García
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to Cecilia Díez-García, RN, MSc, Nursing Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Sant Antoni Maria Claret 167, Barcelona, 08025, Spain.
    Affiliations
    Nursing Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

    Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

    Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ignasi Gich Saladich
    Affiliations
    Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP). Spain

    Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
  • Ignasi Bolibar Ribas
    Affiliations
    Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain

    Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP). Spain

    Sant Pau Biomedical Research Institute (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 10, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2022.10.007

      Abstract

      Purpose

      This study aimed to evaluate, in low-complexity surgical patients, the effectiveness of preoperative assessment carried out by nurses with formal postgraduate anaesthetic training compared to that carried out by anesthesiologists in terms of cancellations and inadequate surgical preparation.

      Design

      This experimental research was conducted using a prospective cohort study.

      Methods

      One hundred and eighty-three patients were recruited who had undergone low-complexity surgery between May and September 2020. Sixty-nine patients were preoperatively assessed by a nurse with specific 1-year postgraduate university training in anesthesia and 114 by an anesthesiologist. Data collection included a questionnaire to assess patient satisfaction and knowledge acquired from the preoperative assessment.

      Findings

      Cancellations of surgery were the same in both cohorts (3.8%, 2.6%). The incidence of poor preparation attributable to the patient was also similar in both cohorts (17.0% vs 18.4%). Patients seen by nurses valued the satisfaction with the preoperative assessment more highly than patients seen by anesthesiologists (median 91.67 vs 84.62). In terms of Knowledge obtained from the preoperative assessment, both professionals did not show statistically significant differences in knowledge levels.

      Conclusions

      Preoperative patient assessment performed by a nurse, with formal anesthesia training, in low-complexity surgical patients can be as effective as that performed by an anesthesiologist, without having an impact on surgical cancellations or patient preparation. On the day of surgery, patients who had been assessed by a nurse were more satisfied with their care during the visit and acquired similar knowledge about preoperative preparation as patients assessed by anesthesiologists.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Troncoso V.
        Evaluación preoperatoria.
        Rev Med Clin Conde. 2011; 22: 340-349
      1. Pre-operative tests.
        Nurs Stand. 2016; 30: 16https://doi.org/10.7748/ns.30.37.16.s16
      2. Barnett S. Anesthesia for the Older Adult - UpToDate. https://www-uptodate-com.ezproxy.javeriana.edu.co/contents/anesthesia-for-the-older-adult. Accessed January 21, 2019.

        • De Hert S
        • Staender S
        • Fritsch G
        • et al.
        Pre-operative evaluation of adults undergoing elective noncardiac surgery: Updated guideline from the European Society of Anaesthesiology.
        Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018; 35: 407-465https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000817
        • Ruspantine P.
        Guest editorial guest editorial.
        Int J Engine Res. 2016; 6: 83-85https://doi.org/10.1177/146808740500600401
        • Galán Gutiérrez JC
        • Galán Cortés JC
        Consentimiento informado en anestesiología: La antelación suficiente como requisito de validez.
        Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2014; 61: 94-100https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redar.2013.05.004
        • De Santana Lemos C
        • De Cassia Giani Peniche A.
        Nursing care in the anesthetic procedure: An integrative review.
        Rev da Esc Enferm. 2016; 50: 154-162https://doi.org/10.1590/S0080-623420160000100020
      3. Fuentelsaz MT, Torruella DR, Montero A. VALORACIÓ PREOPERATÒRIA Avaluació de Risc Anestèsic-Quirúrgic:1-12. Accessed November 19, 2019. http://scartd.org.

        • Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
        Health Care Guideline :Perioperative.
        ICSI, Bloomington, MN2020: 1-84
        https://www.icsi.org/guideline/perioperative/
        Date accessed: January 29, 2022
        • Galbany P
        • Gómez R
        • Rubinat E
        • Sanclemente M.
        La situación de las Enfermras de Anestesia en España:¿Pueden Considerarse de Práctica Avanzada? Aseedar-td.
        Enf. Anest. 2018; 3 (Accessed September 11, 2020): 1-4
        • Tenedios C
        • O'Leary S
        • Capocci M
        • Desai SP
        History of anaesthesia: Nurse anaesthesia practice in the G7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States of America).
        Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018; 35: 158-164https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000774
        • Sanclemente-Dalmau M
        • Galbany-Estragués P
        • Palomar-Aumatell X
        • Rubinat-Arnaldo E.
        Defining competencies for nurse anaesthetists: A Delphi study.
        J Adv Nurs. 2022; 78: 3696-3709https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15348
        • Goñi Leránoz E
        • Pérez de Albéniz Crespo M.
        Autoevaluación de competencias por las enfermeras de Anestesiología.
        Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2009; 56: 147-162https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-9356(09)70357-3
        • Taylor SK
        • Andrzejowski JC
        • Wiles MD
        • Bland S
        • Jones GL
        • Radley SC.
        A prospective observational study of the impact of an electronic questionnaire (ePAQPO) on the duration of nurse-led preoperative assessment and patient satisfaction.
        PLoS One. 2018; 13: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205439
        • Kristoffersen EW
        • Opsal A
        • Tveit TO
        • Berg RC
        • Fossum M.
        Effectiveness of pre-anaesthetic assessment clinic: A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised prospective controlled studies.
        BMJ Open. 2022; 12e054206https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054206
        • Nicholson A
        • Coldwell CH
        • Lewis SR
        • Smith AF
        Nurse-led versus doctor-led preoperative assessment for elective surgical patients requiring regional or general anaesthesia.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; : CD010160https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010160.pub2
        • Hines S
        • Munday J
        • Kynoch K.
        Effectiveness of nurse-led preoperative assessment services for elective surgery: A systematic review update protocol.
        JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Reports. 2013; 11: 73-83https://doi.org/10.11124/jbisrir-2013-541
        • van Klei WA
        • Hennis PJ
        • Moen J
        • Kalkman CJ
        • Moons KGM.
        The accuracy of trained nurses in pre-operative health assessment: Results of the OPEN study.
        Anaesthesia. 2004; 59: 971-978https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2004.03858.x
        • Mata J
        • Moral V
        • Moya MM
        • et al.
        Es eficaz, segura y eficiente una consulta preanestésica en equipo con enfermería?.
        Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2007; 54: 279-287
        • Vandenbroucke JP
        • Von Elm E
        • Altman DG
        • et al.
        Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration.
        Epidemiology. 2007; 18: 805-835https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511
        • Correll DJ
        • Bader AM
        • Hull MW
        • Hsu C
        • Tsen LC
        • Hepner DL.
        Value of preoperative clinic visits in identifying issues with potential impact on operating room efficiency.
        Anesthesiology. 2006; 105: 1254-1259https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200612000-00026
        • Lee A
        • Chui PT
        • Chiu CH
        • Gin T
        • Ho AM.
        The cost-effectiveness of an outpatient anesthesia consultation clinic before surgery: A matched Hong Kong cohort study.
        Perioper Med. 2012; 1: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-0525-1-3
        • World Health Organization (WHO)
        La cirugía segura salva vidas. Organ Mund la Salud.
        Published online. 2016; (Accessed June 7, 2021): 1-28
        • Lewis SR
        • Nicholson A
        • Smith AF
        • Alderson P
        Physician anaesthetists versus non-physician providers of anaesthesia for surgical patients.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 11: CD010357https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010357.pub2
        • Varughese AM
        • Hagerman N
        • Townsend ME.
        Using quality improvement methods to optimize resources and maximize productivity in an anesthesia screening and consultation clinic.
        Paediatr Anaesth. 2013; 23: 597-606https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12185
        • Bowen D
        • Bader A
        • Bowen-Weeks K
        • Canning L
        • Cheney M
        • Dello Iacono D.
        The value of the visit: Quantifying the value added from a preoperative assessment.
        Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2016; 3: 32-38https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2016.05.005
        • Allison J
        • George M.
        Using preoperative assessment and patient instruction to improve patient safety.
        AORN J. 2014; 99: 364-375https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aorn.2013.10.021
        • World Health Organization
        Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection.
        2nd. World Heal Organ, 2018 (Accessed June 7, 2021)
        • Herrera-Usagre M
        • Santana V
        • Burgos-Pol R
        • et al.
        Effect of a mobile app on preoperative patient preparation for major ambulatory surgery: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
        JMIR Res Protoc. 2019; 8e10938https://doi.org/10.2196/10938
        • Green AM.
        Nurse directed pre-admission clinics.
        Ambul Surg. 2000; 8: 97-100https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6532(99)00058-X
        • Díez-álvarez E
        • Arrospide A
        • Mar J
        • et al.
        Efectividad de una intervención preoperatoria de enfermería sobre el control de la ansiedad de los pacientes quirúrgicos.
        Enferm Clin. 2012; 22: 18-26https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcli.2011.09.005
        • Walker JA.
        What is the effect of preoperative information on patient satisfaction?.
        Br J Nurs. 2007; 16: 27-32https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2007.16.1.22712
        • Ross J.
        Effective communication improves patient safety.
        J Perianesthesia Nurs. 2018; 33: 223-225https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2018.01.003
        • Barber P
        • López-Valcárcel BG.
        Forecasting the need for medical specialists in Spain: Application of a system dynamics model.
        Hum Resour Health. 2010; 8: 1-9https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4491-8-24