Advertisement

Identification of Patient-Related and Procedure-Related Factors Contributing to Hypoxemia in Adult Outpatients Undergoing Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)

Published:October 27, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2022.05.080

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To assess which patient factors and procedure-related factors contribute to hypoxemia during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and determine whether prophylactic oropharyngeal suctioning reduces the rate of hypoxemia when compared to oropharyngeal suctioning when clinically indicated by patient's coughing or secretions.

      Design

      This was a single-site study taking place at a private practice, outpatient facility with no anesthesia trainees present. Patients were randomized to one of two groups based on birth month. After the administration of sedating medications but before the insertion of the endoscope, Group A was oropharyngeal suctioned by either the anesthesia provider or the proceduralist. Group B was oropharyngeal suctioned only when clinically indicated by coughing or visible copious secretions.

      Methods

      Data were collected on a variety of patient and procedure-related factors. Associations between these factors and hypoxemia during esophagogastroduodenoscopy were analyzed using the statistical analysis system application JMP. After analysis and literature review, a protocol for prevention and treatment of hypoxemia during EGD was proposed.

      Findings

      This study found that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increases the risk for hypoxemia during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. There were no other statistically significant associations between other factors and hypoxemia.

      Conclusions

      This study highlights factors that should be evaluated in the future when considering the risk of hypoxemia during EGD. Although not statistically significant, this study's results indicated that prophylactic oropharyngeal suctioning may reduce rates of hypoxemia, as only 1 of 4 cases of hypoxemia occurred in Group A. Additionally, future studies on hypoxemia during monitored anesthesia care for EGD should include an evaluation of the impact of American Society of Anesthesiologists class, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, body mass index, obstructive sleep apnea, and opioid administration on hypoxemia risk.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Robberze R
        • Posner KL
        • Domino KB.
        Closed claims review of anesthesia for procedures outside the operating room.
        Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006; 19: 436-442https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aco.0000236146.46346.fe
      1. American Society of Anesthesiologists House of Delegates/Executive Committee. ASA physical status class. American Society of Anesthesiologists website. October 23, 2019. Accessed July 12, 2020. https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system

        • Vargo JJ
        • Niklewski PJ
        • Williams JL
        • Martin JF
        • Faigel DO.
        Patient safety during sedation by anesthesia professionals during routine upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: an analysis of 1.28 million procedures.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2017; 85: 101-108https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.007
        • Tobias JD
        • Leder M.
        Procedural sedation: a review of sedative agents, monitoring, and management of complications.
        Saudi J Anaesth. 2011; 5: 395-410https://doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.87270
        • Gonzalez RM.
        Hypoxia during upper GI endoscopy: there is still room for improvement.
        APSF Newsletter. 2019; 34: 7-8
        • Müller M
        • Wehrmann T.
        How to best approach endoscopic sedation?.
        Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 8: 481-490https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2011.122
        • Agostoni M
        • Fanti L
        • Gemma M
        • Pasculli N
        • Beretta L
        • Testoni PA.
        Adverse events during monitored anesthesia care for GI endoscopy: an 8-year experience.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 266-275https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011.04.028
        • Coté GA
        • Hovis RM
        • Ansstats MA
        • et al.
        Incidence of sedation-related complications with Propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures.
        Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010; 8: 137-142https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2009.07.008
        • Qadeer MA
        • Lope AR
        • Dumot JA
        • Vargo JJ.
        Risk factors for hypoxemia during ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy in ASA I-II patients.
        Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 54: 1035-1040https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-008-0452-2
        • Wani S
        • Azar R
        • Hovis CE
        • et al.
        Obesity as a risk factor for sedation-related complications during propofol-mediated sedation for advanced endoscopic procedures.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74: 1238-1247https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2011. 09.006
        • Mehta PP
        • Kochhar G
        • Kalra S
        • et al.
        Can a validated sleep apnea scoring system predict cardiopulmonary events using propofol sedation for routine EGD or colonoscopy? A prospective cohort study.
        Gastrointest Endosc. 2014; 79: 436-444https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.09.022
        • Sharma VK
        • Nguyen CC
        • Crowell MD
        • Lieberman DA
        • Garmo P
        • Fleischer DE.
        A national study of cardiopulmonary unplanned events after GI endoscopy.
        Gastrointes Endosc. 2007; 66: 27-34https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.12.040
        • Geng W
        • Jia D
        • Wang Y
        • et al.
        A prediction model for hypoxemia during routine sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        Clinics. 2018; 73: e513https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2018/e513
        • Qadeer MA
        • Lopez AR
        • Dumot JA
        • Vargo JJ.
        Hypoxemia during moderate sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy: causes and associations.
        Digestion. 2011; 84: 37-45https://doi.org/10.1159/000321621
        • Kim EJ
        • Um MY
        • Kim KO
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of glycopyrrolate as a premedication for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
        Endoscopy. 2017; 49: 949-956https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-112491
        • Saunders R
        • Erslon M
        • Vargo J.
        Modeling the cost and benefits of capnography monitoring during procedural sedation for gastrointestinal endoscopy.
        Endosc Int Open. 2016; 4: E340-E351https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-100719
        • Jopling MQ
        • Qiu J.
        Capnography sensor use is associated with reduction of adverse outcomes during gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures with sedation administration.
        BMC Anesthesiol. 2017; 17: 157https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-017-0453-9