Advertisement

Differences in Perioperative Nurse Job Satisfaction by Specialty Certification Status

Published:November 17, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2022.04.018

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To describe differences in perioperative RN job satisfaction by specialty certification status.

      Design

      A retrospective, exploratory, cross-sectional design.

      Methods

      We conducted a secondary analysis of annual data from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI) RN Survey with 12 Job Satisfaction Scales. The sample consisted of 776 perioperative units in 206 hospitals with 13,061 study participants. We used multilevel mixed modeling to examine differences in job satisfaction for nurses holding CAPA (Certified Ambulatory Perianesthesia Nurse), CPAN (Certified Post Anesthesia Nurse), CNOR (certification for perioperative registered nurses), CRNFA (Certified RN First Assistant), other specialty certification, and not specialty certified.

      Findings

      Twelve percent of RN participants held a perioperative nursing certification (CAPA, CPAN, CNOR, CRNFA), 15% held other nursing specialty certifications, and 73% were not certified. Regardless of certification status, nurses were the most satisfied with nurse-nurse interactions and task. They were the least satisfied with nursing administration, decision-making, and pay. CNOR certified nurses reported the lowest levels of job satisfaction in the study. CAPA and CPAN certified nurses reported higher job satisfaction than their noncertified colleagues on multiple job satisfaction scales (ie, CAPA 10 of 12; CPAN 5 of 12). CNOR certified nurses did not report meaningful differences in job satisfaction from non-certified nurses.

      Conclusions

      As job satisfaction impacts retention, productivity, and patient care quality, our findings have important implications for hospital leaders, nurses, and health care consumers. Based on our findings, we identified nursing professional development as a potential gap in job satisfaction that leaders can target for improvement. Our findings suggest that higher specialty nursing certification rates in perianesthesia nurses may potentially improve job satisfaction and retention of nurses.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Smiley RA
        • Ruttinger C
        • Oliveira CM
        • et al.
        The 2020 National Nursing Workforce Survey.
        J Nurs Regul. 2021; 12: S1-S96https://doi.org/10.1016/s2155-8256(21)00027-2
      1. National Academy of Medicine. The Future of Nursing 2020-2030. National Academy of Sciences. Accessed February 1, 2020. https://nam.edu/publications/the-future-of-nursing-2020-2030/

        • Dempsey C
        • Assi MJ.
        The impact of nurse engagement on quality, safety, and the experience of care: What nurse leaders should know.
        Nurs Adm Q. 2018; 42: 278-283
        • Stucky CH
        • Wymer JA.
        Progressing toward specialty certification as the National Standard for Nursing.
        Nurs Forum. 2020; 55: 531-534https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12459
        • Corrigan JM
        • Kohn LT
        • Donaldson MS.
        To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System.
        National Academies Press, 2000
        • Stucky CH
        • De Jong MJ
        • Wymer JA.
        Certified Surgical Services Manager (CSSM): the new gold standard for perioperative nurse leaders.
        J Perianesth Nurs. 2020; 35: 557-563https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2020.04.003
        • Stucky CH
        • De Jong MJ
        • Kabo FW.
        Military surgical team communication: implications for safety.
        Mil Med. 2020; 185: e448-e456https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz330
        • Schwendimann R
        • Blatter C
        • Dhaini S
        • Simon M
        • Ausserhofer D.
        The occurrence, types, consequences and preventability of in-hospital adverse events - a scoping review.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18: 521https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3335-z
        • Stucky CH
        • De Jong MJ.
        Surgical team familiarity: an integrative review.
        AORN J. 2021; 113: 64-75https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13281
        • Wright MI
        • Polivka B
        • Abusalem S.
        An examination of factors that predict the perioperative culture of safety.
        AORN J. 2021; 113: 465-475https://doi.org/10.1002/aorn.13373
        • Boyle DK.
        Nursing specialty certification and patient outcomes: what we know in acute care hospitals and future directions.
        J Assoc Vasc Access. 2017; 22: 137-142https://doi.org/10.1016/j.java.2017.06.002
        • Boyle DK
        • Baernholdt M
        • Adams JM
        • et al.
        Improve nurses' well-being and joy in work: implement true interprofessional teams and address electronic health record usability issues.
        Nurs Outlook. 2019; 67: 791-797https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2019.10.002
        • Wei H
        • Sewell KA
        • Woody G
        • Rose MA.
        The state of the science of nurse work environments in the United States: a systematic review.
        Int J Nurs Sci. 2018; 5: 287-300https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2018.04.010
        • Whitehead L
        • Ghosh M
        • Walker DK
        • Bloxsome D
        • Vafeas C
        • Wilkinson A.
        The relationship between specialty nurse certification and patient, nurse and organizational outcomes: A systematic review.
        Int J Nurs Stud. 2019; 93: 1-11https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.02.001
        • Coleman EA
        • Coon SK
        • Lockhart K
        • et al.
        Effect of certification in oncology nursing on nursing-sensitive outcomes.
        J Nurs Adm. 2010; 40: S35-S42https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e3181f37f9f
        • Hughes LC
        • Ward S
        • Grindel CG
        • et al.
        Relationships between certification and job perceptions of oncology nurses.
        Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001; 28: 99-106
        • Reich J
        • Smith J
        • Del Guidice M.
        A certification support program: Impact on nurse autonomy, nursing practice, outcomes and culture.
        Nurse Leader. 2016; 14: 334-338https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2016.06.005
        • Wyatt J
        • Harrison M.
        Certified pediatric nurses' perceptions of job satisfaction.
        Pediatr Nurs. 2010; 36: 205-208
      2. Schunemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G. Handbook for Grading the Quality of Evidence and the Strength of Recommendations Using the GRADE Approach. Accessed February 5, 2022. https://gdt.gradepro.org/app/handbook/handbook.html

        • Stamps PL.
        Nurses and work satisfaction: an index for measurement.
        Am J Nurs. 1998; 98
        • Lt Hu
        • PM Bentler
        Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives.
        Struct Equ Modeling. 1999; 6: 1-55https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
        • McDonald RP.
        Test Theory: A Unified Treatment. xi. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, 1999: 485 (485-xi)
        • McDonald RP.
        The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis.
        Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1970; 23: 1-21https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.x
        • Benjamini Y
        • Hochberg Y.
        Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.
        J Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological). 1995; 57: 289-300
        • Wasserstein AL
        • Lazar NA.
        The ASA statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose.
        Am Statistician. 2016; 70: 129-133https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108
        • Boyle DK
        • Gajewski BJ
        • Miller PA.
        A longitudinal analysis of nursing specialty certification by Magnet® status and patient unit type.
        J Nurs Adm. 2012; 42: 567-573https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0b013e318274b581
        • Boyle DK
        • Cramer E
        • Potter C
        • Staggs VS.
        Longitudinal association of registered nurse national nursing specialty certification and patient falls in acute care hospitals.
        Nurs Res. 2015; 64: 291-299https://doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000107
        • Green B
        • Oeppen RS
        • Smith DW
        • Brennan PA.
        Challenging hierarchy in healthcare teams - ways to flatten gradients to improve teamwork and patient care.
        Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017; 55: 449-453https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.02.010
      3. Benner PE. Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment & Ethics. In: Tanner CA, Chesla CA, editors. 2nd ed. ed. New York: New York: Springer; 2009.

        • Wymer JA
        • Stucky CH
        • De Jong MJ.
        Nursing leadership and COVID-19: defining the shadows and leading ahead of the data.
        Nurse Lead. 2021; 19: 483-488https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2021.06.004
        • Vazquez-Calatayud M
        • Errasti-Ibarrondo B
        • Choperena A.
        Nurses' continuing professional development: a systematic literature review.
        Nurse Educ Pract. 2021; 50102963https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102963
        • Schmalenberg C
        • Kramer M.
        Clinical units with the healthiest work environments.
        Crit Care Nurse. 2008; 28: 65-77https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2008.28.3.65
        • Van Wicklin SA
        • Maio S
        • Homme C
        • Stobinski JX.
        Reintroducing the PVCT: a revised measure of the perceived value of certification among registered nurses.
        Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2022; 26100246https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcorm.2022.100246
        • Goedhart NS
        • van Oostveen CJ
        • Vermeulen H.
        The effect of structural empowerment of nurses on quality outcomes in hospitals: a scoping review.
        J Nurs Manag. 2017; 25: 194-206https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12455
        • Prado-Inzerillo M
        • Clavelle JT
        • Fitzpatrick JJ.
        Leadership practices and engagement among Magnet® hospital chief nursing officers.
        J Nurs Adm. 2018; 48: 502-507https://doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000658
      4. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. Nursing Shortage. Accessed February 5, 2022. https://www.aacnnursing.org/news-information/fact-sheets/nursing-shortage

        • Galanis P
        • Vraka I
        • Fragkou D
        • Bilali A
        • Kaitelidou D.
        Nurses' burnout and associated risk factors during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        J Adv Nurs. 2021; 77: 3286-3302https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14839
        • Stucky CH
        • De Jong MJ
        • Lowe AW
        • Mathews B.
        COVID-19: initial perioperative and perianesthesia nursing response in a military medical center.
        J Perianesth Nurs. 2020; 35: 353-356https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2020.04.010