Advertisement

A Comprehensive Protocol to Prevent Brachial Plexus Injury During Ankylosing Spondylitis Surgery

Published:November 03, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jopan.2017.09.005

      Purpose

      This article describes a comprehensive protocol to protect the brachial plexus when performing pedicle subtraction osteotomy for ankylosing spondylitis patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis.

      Design

      A descriptive study was conducted.

      Methods

      Records of 101 cases from October 2013 to December 2016 were retrospectively audited. The protocol included five items: (1) preoperative assessment of motion range and nerve function of limbs and trunks; (2) preoperative positioning according to the assessment results; (3) intra-operative somatosensory evoked potential and blood pressure monitoring; (4) intra-operative repositioning according to the monitoring alarm signals; and (5) postoperative neurological function check.

      Findings

      Five patients showed impending brachial plexus injury indicators, including two who had a decrease in blood pressure and three who had a decrease in the amplitude of somatosensory evoked potential. After adjustment of position and soft pads, one patient had brachial plexus injury (0.99%) and the recovery time was 2 weeks.

      Conclusions

      With this comprehensive strategy, the brachial plexus could be effectively protected during the surgery.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Calin A.
        • Fries J.F.
        Striking prevalence of ankylosing spondylitis in “healthy” w27 positive males and females.
        N Engl J Med. 1975; 293: 835-839
        • Sm V.D.L.
        • Valkenburg H.A.
        • de Jongh B.M.
        • Cats A.
        The risk of developing ankylosing spondylitis in HLA-B27 positive individuals. A comparison of relatives of spondylitis patients with the general population.
        Arthritis Rheum. 1984; 27: 241-249
        • Chang K.W.
        • Chen Y.Y.
        • Lin C.C.
        • Hsu H.L.
        • Pai K.C.
        Closing wedge osteotomy versus opening wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30: 1584-1593
        • Kim K.T.
        • Suk K.S.
        • Cho Y.J.
        • Hong G.P.
        • Park B.J.
        Clinical outcome results of pedicle subtraction osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with kyphotic deformity.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27: 612-618
        • Qian B.P.
        • Jiang J.
        • Qiu Y.
        • Wang B.
        • Yu Y.
        • Zhu Z.Z.
        The presence of a negative sacral slope in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with severe thoracolumbar kyphosis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: e188
        • Ferrante M.A.
        Brachial plexopathies: classification, causes, and consequences.
        Muscle Nerve. 2004; 30: 547-568
        • Wilbourn A.J.
        Plexopathies.
        Neurol Clin. 2007; 25: 139-171
        • Kamel I.
        • Barnette R.
        Positioning patients for spine surgery: avoiding uncommon position-related complications.
        World J Orthop. 2014; 5: 425-443
        • Desai D.C.
        • Uribe A.
        • Lachman T.
        Brachial plexus injury due to compression: an alternate mechanism of injury: case report and review of the literature.
        Am Surg. 1997; 63: 487-489
        • Bhardwaj D.
        • Peng P.
        An uncommon mechanism of brachial plexus injury. A case report.
        Can J Anesth. 1999; 46: 173-175
        • Nuwer M.R.
        • Schrader L.M.
        • Coutin-Churchman P.
        Somatosensory-Evoked Potential Monitoring.
        Springer, New York, NY2014
        • Li F.
        • Gorji R.
        • Allott G.
        • Modes K.
        • Lunn R.
        • Yang Z.J.
        The usefulness of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in cervical spine surgery: a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients.
        J Neurosurg Anesth. 2012; 24: 185-190
        • Chung I.
        • Glow J.A.
        • Dimopoulos V.
        • et al.
        Upper-limb somatosensory evoked potential monitoring in lumbosacral spine surgery: a prognostic marker for position-related ulnar nerve injury.
        Spine J. 2009; 9: 287-295
        • La Neve J.E.
        • Zitney G.P.
        Use of somatosensory evoked potentials to detect and prevent impending brachial plexus injury during surgical positioning for the treatment of supratentorial pathologies.
        Neurodiagnostic J. 2014; 54: 260-273
        • Jellish W.S.
        • Sherazee G.
        • Patel J.
        • et al.
        Somatosensory evoked potentials help prevent positioning-related brachial plexus injury during skull base surgery.
        Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 149: 168-173
        • Chen Z.
        • Chen L.
        • Kwon P.
        • Montez M.
        • Voegeli T.
        • Bueff H.
        Detection of positional brachial plexus injury by radial arterial line during spinal exposure before neuromonitoring confirmation: a retrospective case study.
        J Clin Monit Comput. 2012; 26: 483-486
        • Kamel I.
        • Zhao H.
        • Koch S.A.
        • Brister N.
        • Barnette R.E.
        The use of somatosensory evoked potentials to determine the relationship between intraoperative arterial blood pressure and intraoperative upper extremity position-related neurapraxia in the prone surrender position during spine surgery: a retrospective analysis.
        Anesth Analg. 2016; 122: 1423-1433
        • Cohen G.
        • Rampal V.
        • Aubart-Cohen F.
        • Seringe R.
        • Wicart P.
        Brachial plexus birth palsy shoulder deformity treatment using subscapularis release combined to tendons transfer.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96: 334-339
        • Rinella A.
        • Lenke L.
        • Whitaker C.
        • et al.
        Perioperative halo-gravity traction in the treatment of severe scoliosis and kyphosis.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30: 475-482
        • Bible J.E.
        • Rihn J.A.
        • Lim M.R.
        • Brodke D.S.
        • Lee J.Y.
        Avoiding and managing intraoperative complications during cervical spine surgery.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23: e81-e90
        • Thirumala P.D.
        • Bodily L.
        • Tint D.
        • et al.
        Somatosensory-evoked potential monitoring during instrumented scoliosis corrective procedures: validity revisited.
        Spine J. 2014; 14: 1572-1580
        • Nuwer M.R.
        • Dawson E.G.
        • Carlson L.G.
        • Kanim L.E.
        • Sherman J.E.
        Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey.
        Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995; 96: 6-11
        • Uribe J.S.
        • Kolla J.
        • Omar H.
        • et al.
        Brachial plexus injury following spinal surgery.
        J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 13: 552-558
        • Kamel I.R.
        • Drum E.T.
        • Koch S.A.
        • et al.
        The use of somatosensory evoked potentials to determine the relationship between patient positioning and impending upper extremity nerve injury during spine surgery: a retrospective analysis.
        Anesth Analg. 2006; 102: 1538-1542
        • Labrom R.D.
        • Hoskins M.
        • Reilly C.W.
        • Tredwell S.J.
        • Wong P.K.
        Clinical usefulness of somatosensory evoked potentials for detection of brachial plexopathy secondary to malpositioning in scoliosis surgery.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30: 2089-2093
        • Schwartz D.M.
        • Drummond D.S.
        • Hahn M.
        • Ecker M.L.
        • Dormans J.P.
        Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis.
        J Spinal Disord. 2000; 13: 178-182
        • Lorenzini N.A.
        • Poterack K.A.
        Somatosensory evoked potentials are not a sensitive indicator of potential positioning injury in the prone patient.
        J Clin Monit. 1996; 12: 171
        • Myers R.R.
        • Yamamoto T.
        • Yaksh T.L.
        • Powell H.C.
        The role of focal nerve ischemia and Wallerian degeneration in peripheral nerve injury producing hyperesthesia.
        Anesthesiology. 1993; 78: 308
        • Lundborg G.
        Structure and function of the intraneural microvessels as related to trauma, edema formation, and nerve function.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975; 57: 938
        • Lundborg G.
        • Rydevik B.
        Effects of stretching the tibial nerve of the rabbit. A preliminary study of the intraneural circulation and the barrier function of the perineurium.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1973; 55: 390-401

      Biography

      Lin Rui, BSN, Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

      Biography

      Guomei Xu, MSN, Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

      Biography

      Xiaofan Lv, MSN, Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

      Biography

      Zhengliang Ma, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China