« Previous
Next »
Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
Volume 21, Issue 5
, Pages 311-316
, October 2006
Effectiveness of Femoral Nerve Blockade for Pain Control After Total Knee Arthroplasty
References
- Femoral nerve block: Single injection versus continuous infusion for total knee replacement. Reg Anesth. 1996;21:292–297
- Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine, continuous epidural analgesia, and continuous three-in-one block on postoperative pain and knee rehabilitation after unilateral total knee arthroplasty. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:88–92
- . Comparison of lumbar plexus block versus conventional opioid analgesia after total knee replacement. Anaesthesia. 1991;46:275–277
- . In: The Pain Manual: Principles and Issues in Cancer Pain Management. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: Pegasus Healthcare International; 1997;p. 122
- . In: Peripheral Nerve Blocks: A Color Atlas. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 1999;p. 96
- Continuous blockade of the lumbar plexus after knee surgery−postoperative analgesia and bupivacaine plasma concentrations. Anaesthesia. 1988;43:1015–1018
- . Continuous low-dose 3-in-1 nerve blockade for postoperative pain relief after total knee replacement. Anesth Analg. 1992;75:265–267
- Effects of perioperative analgesic technique on the surgical outcome and duration of rehabilitation after major knee surgery [abstract]. Anesthesiology. 1999;91:8–15
- Peripheral nerve blocks improve analgesia after total knee replacement surgery. Anesth Analg. 1998;87:93–97
- Femoral nerve block with 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine improves postoperative analgesia following outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:24–29
- Postoperative pain treatment after open knee surgery: Continuous lumbar plexus block with bupivacaine versus epidural morphine. Reg Anesth. 1991;16:34–37
- . The effect of single-injection femoral nerve block on rehabilitation and length of hospital stay after total knee replacement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002;27:139–144
Funding for this project was provided by the Victoria General Hospital Medical Staff Council and the Victoria General Hospital Foundation, and was also partially supported by National Science and Engineering Research Council.
PII: S1089-9472(06)00212-7
doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2006.05.011
© 2006 American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing
Volume 21, Issue 5
, Pages 311-316
, October 2006
